/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15812378
>Do you know exactly how the laws of physics are operating are on Earth, now? Nope.
Yes, proven through everyday operated technologies that works.
>They show the physics out there is consistent with current theory.
They show colors out there that MIGHT turn out to be consistent with current theories.
>That's the best you can do in space or in the lab.
Wrong, if you hypothetically have a ship you can fly out of the solar system and conduct experimentations then you would know for sure as compared to peering out of a telescope on Earth. Obviously we don't and therefore current cosmological conclusions are completely wonky.
>Build a model of the dome and test it.
The hypothetical dome would produce exact images we are observing now, just as a hypothetical lid would produce the exact sky the frog would observe in picrel.
>Give me an example of an experiment which proved some theory of physics "exactly" correct.
The fact you are successfully sending electronic messages over the internet.

Also add to the fact since you are aware no one knows if laws of physics is different in the past or might change in the future, this very possibility completely invalidates the whole of cosmology as it becomes impossible to extrapolate the origin and ending of the universe.

>Do you know exactly how the laws of physics are operating are on Earth, now? Nope.
Yes, proven through everyday operated technologies that works.
>They show the physics out there is consistent with current theory.
They show colors out there that MIGHT turn out to be consistent with current theories.
>That's the best you can do in space or in the lab.
Wrong, if you hypothetically have a ship you can fly out of the solar system and conduct experimentations then you would know much better than peering out of a telescope on Earth. Obviously we don't and therefore current cosmological conclusions are completely wonky.
>Build a model of the dome and test it.
The hypothetical dome would produce exact images we are observing now, just as a hypothetical lid would produce the exact sky the frog would observe in picrel.
>Give me an example of an experiment which proved some theory of physics "exactly" correct.
The fact you are successfully sending electronic messages over the internet.

Also add to the fact since you are aware no one knows if laws of physics is different in the past or might change in the future, this very possibility completely invalidates the whole of cosmology as it becomes impossible to extrapolate the origin and ending of the universe.

>>15811523
>We have a fairly good idea what we're looking at
No you don't.
>figure out what all of the stuff out there is, how it works, and hence how the laws of nature work
You do realize all you are doing is seeing dots in the sky and extrapolating how things work here on Earth to those dots?
It's no different from the famous frog in a well story told to kids.
If laws of nature are different out there all your cosmological conclusions becomes completely bogus.