/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5180483

>>3511764

>>3492868
http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/forever-young/manhattan-beach-project-end-aging-2029

http://www.ted.com/themes/might_you_live_a_great_deal_longer.html

http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/07/sierra-sciences-working-towards.html

http://www.sens.org/sens-research/research-themes

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3329065877451441972#

http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101128/full/news.2010.635.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/nov/28/scientists-reverse-ageing-mice-humans

>>3492916
>You cant stop the body from aging with out stopping the body's rejuvenation factors.
[citation needed]

>>3493040
Babies and the resulting overpoulation aren't a spontaneous reaction. It's a choice. Accept immortality and a form of sterilization, or don't. And if you've picked the first option, you might be able to have a baby as soon as living space and resources are more abundant. I.E. space colonization.

>>3493056
Biological immortality via curing aging means that after puberty your body doesn't begin deteriorating. This doesn't mean old people stay the way they are permanently, rather it means to revert to something along the lines of their 25 y/o body.