/sci/ - Science & Math

What's the most accurate syntactic parser for English?

>>6010082
>Man up OP. Don't make me call you a faggot.
I wish it were that simple. I've tried telling myself that many times and it works for 4 or 5 days, until like Marmeladov, I crash and burn.

>>6010085
>'Afraid' is probably the wrong word.
I used that because that's how I felt. My heart beating rapidly, stomach in a knot, etc.

>Studying is usually just reading. Reading can not hurt you.
No it usually can't.

>Do you mean you are lazy?
That might be it, but there's a good part of me that legitimately knows I have to get shit done or face shitty consequences

>Junior in highschool.
>Only ever studied once or twice; rarely apply myself due to procrastination and anxiety.
>GPA (Weighted): Freshman 3.9, Sophomore 3.7 and Junior: 3.6
>Applying to NC State, UNC Wilmington, and UNC Chapel Hill

I don't really care about going to a University right after highschool, my parents want me to so I'm applying anyway. I'd rather just spend 1-2 years at community college, work on my problems and then transfer to a decent state school.

I preferably want to double major in Physics & Philosophy because I'm really interested by both subjects and believe that I would be most motivated to study/put effort into them and thus do well. Although I would strongly consider Physics & Engineering as (correct me if I'm wrong) that would increase my employability?


Questions:
1. I've heard/read that research and internships is especially important for STEMs trying to finding work after college. How true is this?

2. Would spending 1 or 2 years at CC and transfering in sacrifice any research or internship oppurtunites? Or do those come after you've already declared?

cliffs:
>fucked off in highschool; b and c average.
>can i go to Community College, transfer to a state college, and still make (=>$50k/year) it?

i am a libertarian socialist
and i believe that humanity is mostly to blame for recent climate change

(-9,-8)
libertarian socialist master race

Noam Chomsky - Communications

I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not subject to a descriptive fact. Furthermore, the notion of level of grammaticalness is unspecified with respect to the traditional practice of grammarians. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is rather different from the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34). We have already seen that the natural general principle that will subsume this case appears to correlate rather closely with problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. This suggests that the earlier discussion of deviance delimits the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.

>>995725
It sort of does. No one cares that isn't a huge faggot.