[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14856136 [View]
File: 110 KB, 275x326, 10ec486aa6f19aae6a1508a13be44c9779877d7c524e0994e94be15af5e96c18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14856136

>>14856135
>a massive global conflict that will result in millions of deaths isn't in the cards
>nothing bad will happen in the next 5-10 years that will completely reshuffle global politics and the modern way of life

>> No.10532371 [View]
File: 110 KB, 275x326, 1549787051998.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10532371

>>10532279
>It's such a small correlation that it might as well be explained by random chance, or literally anything else.
Lmao.
Schitzo posters BTFO yet again.

>> No.5078495 [View]
File: 110 KB, 275x326, 1347680984477.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5078495

Hey umn, I figure this is the best place to ask.

I've been working on a formula for whether or not to date someone,
and the structure is bothering me.

1/2(W)-(aT+pT+V) is the bulk (a few values missing, but those are listed below)

Attractiveness Tally (aT) is based on a 1-10 basic scale
Hair
Skin
Eyes
Facial structure
Body shape
Genitals

Personality Tally (pT) also based on 1-10 scale
Submissiveness
Comparability
Understanding
Ambitions
Likability

Voice (V) 1-10 scale

Negatives:(n) is one of the parts that is bothering me. I'd like to include it in the formula, but its value would be non-existent if not applicable, and 0 if applicable. (so if theyre a furry, it would all be multiplied by 0)
Furry (0)

Personality Flaws: 1/2(W)- another part that doesn't feel a bit right, or can be expressed better. I'd like the flaws, 1-10 scale, be halved, then subtracted from the bulk. I think I was able to fit it in right, but it could always be fixed.
Weakness
Curiosity

Fetishes (t) This value is what I need most help with. I'm aiming for these to be bonuses added onto the total equation but not over expressed. My initial thought was Fetishes (t) multiplied by the total formula, but I can't have a total 0 penalty for not sharing a fetish, and I think multiplying the score by 2 or 3 would be way too high. Maybe turning this value into an all-over division somehow?
(fetishes censored)
Fetish
Fetish
Fetish
Fetish
Fetish

My planned range would be

60 insta-reject
80 consider
100 realistic
120 perfect
130+ Insta-date

Any help would be appreciated.
I feel like I have a good idea of what I'm planning out, but very little experience with these kinds of things to put it altogether.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]