/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11277537
Don't tease epsilons. They are literally conditioned from birth to believe their pathetic existence scrubbing the shit is paradise.

Don't be mean to pedo-kun! He doesn't want to hurt anyone. He's less dangerous than all shitskins, even if he is a mentally warped, deviant fetishist.

>>10707547
The medium has mass and is made out of matter. Mass is a property of matter and all mediums are made out of matter. The matter which composes the medium is not accurately described by the standard model or Feynman's sea of virtual particles, and is not ruled out by the null result of the Michelson- Morley experiment as many would wrongfully believe.
I understand that you are frustrated.

>>9822934
rude!

>>8901395
>>8901672
no bully

>kek denier getting BTFO so hard
At this point Akarin had to intervene

>>8722308
No bullying in my thread, please

>>7298053
I'm the guy who BTFO'd the denier by fact checking his shit and to be fair, the paper cited is legit (actually I do personally know some of the authors).

http://icebubbles.ucsd.edu/publications/Kobashi_2011_GRL.pdf

However, if any of you want to just skim the paper quickly please read the last part: "5.3. Present Temperature in the Context of the Past
4000 Yr." The authors conclude that according to their dataset, the current decade has not exceed natural variability within the last 4000 years. The authors however put multiple caveats: 1. His proxy records annual T and winter T in greenland is highly variable 2. This dataset focus on Greenland site only, does not reflect other area. 3. There is still uncertainty with regards to inversion in the convective column of the snow that the author outright admit he didn't take into account.

This
http://www.nipccreport.org/articles/2012/feb/14feb2012a1.html

however, is highly unethical because it spins the authors' result and omitting the caveats that they themselves put in the paper.

But peer reviewed data is peer reviewed data, and in my knowledge these Ar/N2 datasets have not been refuted yet. hope even in an anonymous chinese imageboard amidst all the shiposting we can understand the nuances in arguing about climate and be open minded to new data

>>7076209
no bully!

guys don't be mean to OP he probably just wants to be a girl but is too ugly