/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15802188
> China alone puts out magnitudes more CO2 than we ever will
Keep living in your delusion.

>>14769488
>The US isn't even the largest producer of emissions by year or all time at this point.
Keep denying reality

>>11395638
>>11395673
>shill rat gets exposed
>starts dumping his propaganda folder
Get fucked, shill rat.

b-but what about India

>>11038103
>ad hominem because you have no argument
Lmao.

>>11038107
>B-BUT LOOK AT THIS OTHER THING! IGNORE THE FACT THAT CO2 IS WHAT CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING!
Lmao what a cope.

>>11038113
>The problem is that we now know that if China elects to do that and continues spitting out more CO2 than we do for the next 50 years
"It's fine for the US to have spat out billions of tons of CO2 in the past! China should do as we say, not as we do!"
You fucking idiot. The US has created way more CO2 than China has, pic related. Why shouldn't they produce CO2 now, when they're STILL producing MUCH LESS per person than you are? Why should the US get a free pass on CO2 for decades and yet NOW you want to curb and punish China and not yourself? WOW how utterly convenient.

>One of us is going in the right direction, the other is not
China is still signed up to the Paris Agreement, and China is generating a much bigger percentage of its electricity from renewables than the US. So yes, you are right, one is going in the right direction and the other isn't - because the other is pulling out of the Paris Agreement, and turning back to coal, and undoing other climate protections.

>Penguins don't give a shit about per capita
Penguins give a shit about emissions, and Americans are worse emitters than the Chinese - FACT. You're so fucking dumb it's absurd - or perhaps you think WE'RE dumb and will fall for your brainlet-tier methods of evasion and obfuscation. Thinking this would make you dumb though, so either way, you're fucking stupid.

>set up an agreement that is actually binding
Then you should campaign for that. But you clearly don't care about climate change at all because you're doing everything you can to shift the blame from the US (an objectively worse emitter) to China (an objectively less bad emitter).