/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10835840
>if it's just math how is it also matter?
Well it's got to have a value.
A value denotes a action. And as path of cascade sequence.
It will have an adjective value adjacent/s.
This will result in counter directions to be related.
This is what gives a / field/.
As all values have a potential.
This are parts of arrays. Halbach arrays.

A array can exist only so much before a larger array.
The Halbach array are point to radius related in forces.
Forces across arrays are only stable because of the interchange between their /slin/.
A black hole for example would be the sum of matter consumed to qbits as it's event horizion.
This is because, as a weak force. They are extreme in array density to be stable.
And must be exist out side of the singularity.
The force on singularity side of the horizons would be pressure of matter to horizon.
So this would give a relative point to possibly measure.
So that with atom smashing. We might design arrays that are unique for a particle.
And that also arrays can have non uniform fields. This gives a wide variability to inter field action.
>explain light
I'm not that far into certainty.
But I'm amused at torque rifles.
That a flip chain reaction. can happen.
This is a rifled event. That it's a fluted field impaired by coaxial torsion.
>still breaks some law
May not. We haven't ascertained inter array consumption.
That is how much it cost a bit to have a alignment per pattern.
This would also allow for Bohmian state to be c0onsistant.
As it can motion ahead of a photon relative to the fluting.

>>10825841
>I have no idea what you meant by that. Can you expand on this?
Well in high end physics. As in beyond sub atomic partials, the quarks and other shit.
It's looking that existence is 'proximity' based. The less you can confirm a things sure existence.
The more likely it's going to change, move, or slap your shit.
We've currently reverted to Are magnets different from light and gravity?
I also suggest looking into the Quantum Suicide Booth thought experiment.
Tl;Dr Scientist has a cupboard connected to a 2 position superposition. It can only ever be one position, then must be the next.
Why the fuck does the scientist come out the Sudoku pantry infinite times?
>Spektr-RG is working perfectly well the last I've heard of it.
Glad to know. But that was more a meme.
Less 'technical' space First World programs by funny named country. They have major issue.
>it's literally rocket science.
Fuck this meme. It's parabolic and procession head fucks. Once you warp to that type of thinking. It's easy.
Tracking and craft comms are what fails.

>>10158105
Jelousy of sharks.

>>10001780
It may get more difficult and finely nuanced each technological "level".
Also there's effects on effects on IQ (etc) shown by studies. Some have 10% effect, some have 0.0001% effect. If you gathered all of these studies and added up their effect on intelligence (and what ever else in terms of technological progress) you should see a cumulative 50-99.9% but you'd probably see around 3000% effect.

ITT: most retarded theories you've heard
I'll start
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_suicide_and_immortality

>>9438941


Man is not the measure of things. He is not a necessity. He was not always there, and he can always disappear as well. He may be replaced by others too.

A being can be better or worse at grasping Being, but it is *indeed* something one can be better or worse at.

Their sentiments are a part of Being too in a manner of fashion, such as if china were to decide to break off a chunk of the moon for their space base, that would certainly influence how one calculates the trajectory of lunar orbit. Of course on an even higher level, the dynamics of how those sentiments come about are themselves not without cause either. Certainly, any *comprehensive* theory of how to calculate the moons future states in space should be able to account for the likelihood of a cadre of ape creatures throwing it out of whack, too.