/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14742095
>I already told you to read AR4
You've linked me to a website made by retarded green policy maker who are unironically responsible for our current energy crisis and to refute their website entirely without making your own retarded point. Which part do you want me to refute here, the water stress part where I've already debunked it here? >>14742188

>No, I never said humans will go extinct. Another pathetic lie.
>hurr durr muh mass extinction event
>w-w-w-well i never said we gon be dem extinct
Pathetic

>Another misrepresentation of a source. Every species is evolving, that doesn't mean they can evolve adaptions to any change over a few hundred years.
Did you even read what I wrote? This is in line with my previous argument here>>14740086

>Another deflection.
The irony of you talking about deflection is sweet.
>You've presented nothing that shows humans advanced due to climate change
Again, just because your retarded ass doesn't want to accept reality doesn't mean it's not true.