[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15039206 [View]
File: 43 KB, 828x720, 1669959974602861.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15039206

Can someone please fucking explain what the fuck are em waves, why do charged particles create electric and magnetic forces, are these em waves just like sound waves or mathematical woodoo bullshit with probability waves, is it like a river of photons, what the fuck are photons even, are they actual things or just another one of those unnecessary mathematical objects that particle physicists like to come up with when they don't understand what the fuck is going on, electromagnetism hurts my brain if I don't turn it off and blindly take in the information without thinking about all the bullshit ontological assumptions undergirding the field

>> No.12756175 [View]
File: 43 KB, 828x720, 1612669703899.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12756175

>3x3 matrix whose entries are i*δ_ij
what the fuck does δ_ij mean

>> No.12247928 [View]
File: 43 KB, 828x720, 1602941884313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12247928

>>12247903
I've read the article, and didn't respond because I didn't feel it necessary to embarrass you. But, if you insist; nobody that I know, or any reputable physicists, dispute that fields are the fundamental objects and that particles are epiphenomenal.

The author literally states so.

His article is more or less a delineation of a well apprehended fact describing the grammar of physics with respect to the relationship between the two-formulations of matter under particular instances of observation.

Now fuck off, you mathlet.

>> No.12243212 [View]
File: 43 KB, 828x720, retarded.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12243212

OP here
I also didn't study shit
Maybe that's why

>> No.12241918 [View]
File: 43 KB, 828x720, retarded.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12241918

Can you prove the fundamental theorem of calculus?

>> No.9532808 [View]
File: 43 KB, 828x720, 1508140930614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9532808

>>9532614
Same anon, way simpler than I was making it out to be. Treat LP, MN, and O as the elements to place first, then you're dealing with 3 spots to place LP, MN, or O. P(3,3) is the answer or just 6.

Getting there slowly but surely guys...

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]