/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7136472
Philosophy never reaches any sophisticated level. Arguments in philosophy are shallow and neither understanding nor formulating them requires any qualifications. Every argument in philosophy can be thought of and disproved by a 5 year old. Every person who barely learned to read is equally qualified to produce or dissect a philosophical argument. Children in high school can write an essay disagreeing with a historical philosopher and they won't be marked wrong as long as their arguments are coherent. Deal with it, philosophy has no intellectual merit. It's not like science where you need years of studying before you can even begin to understand contemporary theories.

>>6693729
>New Hope
>Mandela
>New Michigan

Okay guy I need quadratuic equalation. Does number work like Saussure sign where interpretation is base on place in overal sysem? Is Derrida math?

>"It's irrelevant to ask what's before the Big Bang !"