/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10504148
>nor sufficient to explain intelligence
It is more than sufficient when you understand how it functions on a large scale. People think by connecting objects with objects cannot possibly lead to intelligence, and that's correct. It doesn't make sense, right? Well, this article explains exactly how complex reactions can be made through simple mechanisms.
>>10504165
I don't know which reply yours was
was it >>10504041 ?
Read your post again. See if the statements you made have anything to do with the things you quoted. I was confused as well, since this is not even just about missing the point. The "criticism" was fundamentally unrelated to any of my statement.

>Incorrect; the brain is called an organ.
Incorrect what? Where did I say anything about that?
>anyone can "imagine" different types of senses and experience these senses through memory
Did I say something that contradicts this statement? What is this even about?
Is this really my problem?

>>10504152
Guess I'll just let it go