/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9100534
I have all the books I need and I'm in the process of getting more. I plan to self study nearly every field under sun from the comfort of my room. I already downloaded all the courses/curriculum pages for all the "degrees" they have at the major universities. I really enjoy learning new things and expanding my knowledge base, It's also nice having a lot of books to look at, it's very cozy and comforting.

Check here for ebooks ftp://joelixny.ddns.net/The%20All-Embracing%20Library/

What's /sci/'s opinion on the anthropic principle?

Does anybody know how the name of the diagram which shows how the 7 basic emotions (anger, surprise, etc.) combine to form more complex emotions?

I remember seeing that diagram in my psychology textbook somewhere, but I no longer have the said textbook.

Are you having difficulty with the concept of anti-differentiation?

Think in terms of displacement, velocity, acceleration.

Consider the following:
[math]x(t)=\frac{1}{2}t^2+t+1[/math]
where x(t) is displacement in meters and t is time in seconds

When derived with respect to time,
[math]\frac{dx}{dt}=t+1 [/math]
This gives a function for velocity in meters per second, v(t).

When derived with respect to time again,
[math]\frac{dv}{dt}=1 [/math]
This gives a function for acceleration in meters per second squared.

When you anti-derive, you're simply going backwards, from acceleration to velocity to displacement.

I like to think that when you anti-derive (otherwise known as 'integrate'), you're adding a component of whatever you're integrating with respect to.

E.g. when you integrate an acceleration function with respect to time, you add a time component to the function.

>>7747019
>all these buttmad IQ denialists ITT
Denying the scientific validity of IQ is as retarded as denying evolution or climate change. Go back to >>>/pol/ you birdbrained denialists. Science will continue to be true, irregardless of whether it hurts your brainlet feelings.