/sci/ - Science & Math

We are tongue tied. We think, post word tool influence, and we think to use the brain we must command it directly using impulse. However, this is not so, the brain is like a user engine, it's always using the body and to activate the brain is not from the, what would be, second user role. If you activate the brain, it's like a mouse click or hold of a click. You can't think directly, it must be indirect off of sensory input (mouse usage metaphor) and gesture(using the body as a keyboard, metaphorically). Try now to think and all you do is disrupt prior thinking and miss your action completely. Synonymous to thinking is thought which is pre conceived impulse(vice versa is post conceived). The two are not the same but are both sides of impulse. Using the brain properly we would make cycles and designate zones, selecting mindspace (mouse use) position naturally and then in held chain, pulling using our body as leverage away from that selection which would be a temporary essence for a mental event to occur. You can create many things in mind space if you understand the true beauty of mind. Your self is a great computer which can be more entertaining and more powerful than you currently know. Any questions?

It seems wise if the invention of the universe makes consciousness and it thus, works.

How is the world round? Doesn't round imply it bends? Seems flat to me. However, it has a sphere shape. Perhaps this is just an effect. It is possibly a geoid that whipped up into a sphere effect through magnetism. It's never still, it's always reshaping at the highest possible frequency, limiting at a sphere shape.

Turns out both flat earthers and globe earthers are wrong. It's a pyramid earth.

History isn't knowledge. Knowledge is concrete. If anything history is data that possibly contains knowledge.

>>15667807
Let’s see your nobel prize if you know so much better, faggot

>>12768281

I YES YES I AM YESYES I DO YES NO? NO YES YES YES I DO DO DODO YES YES DO I DO YES AM I YES I AM I DO YES YES NO YES I DO I I AM YES I NO ME YES!!!!!!!(!)

Mathematicians and physicists have a firm grip on definitions, theorems and some proofs. How is it that they claim to "know" calculus, linear algebra or even how the real numbers work?

Is it all just cope?

>>11947890
>Ease the boredom
>Has a table of formulas

Anon do yourself a favor and go read a book on introduction to real analysis or an introduction to set theory, relearn thoroughly how the real numbers work and develop deep intuition for geometry in the process, you can become a chad at an early age.

>>11941357
>i thought optics was a physics field
Sure, there's a strong basis in physics, but the applications are everywhere in practically any other field you can think of:
Physics? Lasers and quantum interactions.
Chemistry? Quantum dots.
Astronomy/Astrophysics? Telescopes, imaging techniques, image processing
Material science? Display technology, optical metamaterials, etc (BIG APPLICATIONS HERE)
Comp sci/data science? Backbone of the internet is fiber optic cables. Significant quantum computing efforts are in photonic integrated circuits and other optical processing methods.
Bio/Healthcare? Microscopy, MRI, CT, fluorescence tagging, and more

The list goes on and on.

>>11876087
based physicist poster

What a trash thread.

Daily remainder that before going trough
http://de.arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0103/0103044v5.pdf
you are not allowed to post about big bang, black holes, wormholes, time travel, string theory and astrophysics in general.

>>11206185
Should I say the right answer?

Can people drop me some math Puzzles / find the shaded area type questions? I need to procrastinate reading a book for school and I have an itch for some math righ about now

I did an IQ test. Paid for it. According to the internet it's inflated by as much as 21 points. My question is about simple math.

Maximum score: 166 ( -21 ) = 145

1. My score: 155 ( -21 ) =134

2. 155:166= 0.934 * 145 = 135.4

Why is there a difference between 1 and 2 and what is my real score?

If we know how consciousness works and could create it, what if we would create a robot like brain that instead of neurons to transport information would use light, would the rest of the world slow down compared to the brain because of relativity?

High school student here frustrated with the retardation of the Canadian school system. I want to learn more math. I lost the /sci/ book recommendation infographic.

Could some kind anon post the /sci/ book recommendation infographic?

My younger brother will be finishing IGCSE soon, and I want to make the best choice for him. Right now my parents are dead set on having him do IB. He wants to do aerospace at a well-respected British university. What do anons? I am 19 btw.

Physicist reporting in
Taylor expanding exp(1/sqrt(k))-1=1/sqrt(k)+... and sum 1/sqrt(k) diverges

So I have a project where I need to look at the past population of London and predict the future population. Ive looked at exponential and logistic growth models but the lecturer wants us to dive in deeper.
I saw something where they sat I can use the inverse problem (using existing data to tune model parameters and to use several optimisation techniques) but I don't quite understand what this means or how to go about it.
would anyone be able to explain this to me or provide any guidance for this as I'm not entirely sure.
Thankyou

On stackexchange / reddit / whereever a guy told the following: He found a paper stating a problem; and another paper from a different subfield which essentially contained the solution to the problem. All he had to do for his thesis was to slap them together and write some fluff. IIRC the field was mathematics.

How much knowledge is just lying around, waiting to be found? Can what this guy had done be replicated / automated? Answers from all fields welcome

The proof follows directly from the definitions and is left as an exercise for the reader.