[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.10012524 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10012524

>>10012488
induction nigger.

>> No.6896797 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6896797

>>6896382
At least post worthwhile examples or he's going to prove anything and everything by induction like a fool.

>> No.5858097 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5858097

>>5858094
no base case

>> No.5397146 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5397146

>>5397119
>Inductive argument, no base case
>No clearly defined mechanism for when one specie breaks off from another were they're no longer can cross-breed and truly become distinct
>Lack of modern-era evidence for macroevolution of anything with more than a few cells
>Irreproducible
>Hand-wavy arguments boils down to "lots of time" = "improbable events must always happen"

>> No.5137670 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5137670

>not induction: <span class="math">[/spoiler] F[n](F[n-1],F[n-2]) but your base case only has one point

>> No.5007110 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5007110

>inductive argument
>NO BASE CASE

>> No.5003662 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5003662

>evolution
>inductive argument
>no base case

Nope. All he showed was adaptation

>> No.4594248 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4594248

more like a bad inductive argument

>> No.4463330 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463330

>>4463303
>implying evolution is correct
Ahahahaha
>even the more abstract things like the uncertainty principle are irrelevant because they only hold on the atomic level
Quantum cryptography says hi!

>> No.4044958 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4044958

>macro evolution
>proven

LOLOLOL

>> No.4007362 [View]
File: 54 KB, 1079x507, for_k=infinity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4007362

Why do people say that evolution is proven when no one can prove or has show the base case. It's like saying 3=0

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]