/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3148305
The CDF peak (indicative of a new particle) has pretty much been ruled out by most. It ended up being a flaw in the data analysis method, or some werid shit like that (many papers produced on this already).

Until someone can reproduce it (which no one has been able to do), it is thought of just as experimental error, and of little, if no importance (besides telling us how to not produce such errors in the future)

>>3012035
Can you try re-writing this? They way you present it is pretty shitty, and not easy to follow.

>>2967407
Ok, perhaphs I am being too harsh with you. Yes, I know what you are saying. And you are correct. That is the great things about science, it is possibly falisfyable.

However, the problem is your logic is stilll pretty fail. Yes, new theories come up and replace others. That is how shit works. However, it is unreasonable to not accept current thoeries (when they work really well) cause you want a better theory.

You will never get anything accomplished and have no science or technology at all.

So, maybe new theories come up, and replace the big bang, then more theories replace those, then more theoreis replace those, adinfinimum. According to your logic, you will never believe anythign then. You are the supreme skeptic?Cause you are always waiting for a a better theory? Where does it end? when do you finally accept shit? Is there some bullshit arbritray line you made?

Even though, all the fucking thoeries produced very usuful results, explainations for shit, as well as predicted all sorts of shit, you never believe anything. You use elctricty, but dont believe in electrons, you drive a car but dont believe in thermodynamics. Do you understand your fundemental fail yet?

Additionally, FYI: Theories are seldom completely discarded, they are just "limited in there range of validity". Example, Most Big Bounce theories imply all the big bang theory, it just limits is range of validity.

>>2264968
Not that I have anything against Arabs. It is just not what you would think of, when you think of Switzerland.

>>1005514
THANKS EVERYONE!