/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14849480
>yet another guy thinks this whole "asking for evidence/review" thing smells of communism

I agree, it's a little schizo, and I think OP's article is bullshit, and I certainly don't trust Steve Kirsch, but I find your response amusing. Normies will complain about a few right wing schizos on the internet sperging out about communism or globalism, but then when the mainstream media talks constantly, literally day after day for years and years on end about white nationalism, conspiracy theorists, and neo-nazism, etc., etc. normies like yourself never seem to care. When schizos on the internet are spreading conspiracy theories about the commies, it's the end of the world, and literally a threat to democracy itself, but when billionaires, governments, and multinational corporations spend literally hundreds of millions of dollars pushing conspiracy theories about white nationalism, and they're doing so in an organized and coordinated manner, the normies has no problem with this. Leftists constantly complain about power asymmetries and they claim that abuse and manipulation and crime is bad, but it's even worse when the perpetrator is in a position of wealth or power or prestige. This is a complete lie, however, and it just shows how intellectually disingenuous the woke, pro-censorship types actually are. If they were being consistent with their own principles, then they would be forced to concede that it's much worse when tech companies or social media or cable news spread conspiracy theories about muh "white nationalism" and muh "conspiracy theories", compared to when random uneducated "anti-science" hillbillies on the internet with no institutional support or authority talk about the commies or the globalists on obscure right wing social media platforms (since they're not allowed to do so on the regular platforms like Facebook or Twitter).