/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11173709

>>10639098
>Why has science not yet devised a more efficient method to get in shape?

Literally EVERY thing you need to build huge muscles is well known. The workouts, the diet, the needed rest, EVERYTHING. Dedicate an hour or two a day for 2 or 3 years and you too will look like a Chad.

>>10529532

"Screams manuscripts to Nature over the telephone"

Laughed hard at that :-)
Good Job.

>successful head transplant
>body is 5'5" turbo manlet
>3 inch dick

how much harder is diff eq than calc 3? i just finished calc 3 and i had to study way fucking harder than i ever had in calc 1 or 2 and its my understand diff eq is even harder. i really had to study for a long time with basically every calc 3 concept, before i was able to understand it: fundamental theorem of calculus, rewriting bounds of integrals, building normal vectors to surfaces, interpreting curl/divergence. i still made a really good grade but i studied for hours upon hours

as a side note, why do people act like calc 2 is way harder than calc 3 or diff eq? i barely had to study in calc 2 and i made an A. do europeans have way harder versions of calc 2 or something?