/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2547662

Is EVERYTHING you EVER say a contradiction in terms? The question itself, which I now imagine you yourself asked in the first place, OUTRIGHT STATES as ONE OF ITS PREMISES that the perception is true and the word of the deity is true. It's a hypothetical instance. When answering the question, it doesn't matter if it's possible to actually have a "true perception" or not; the question set that up as a given. The perception MUST be true because the QUESTION SAID SO. It is PART OF THE QUESTION BEING ASKED. How can you not understand this? How can you be so fucktarded as to not get that the premises of the question have rendered the question worthless?

Seriously, you priests of Science are FAIL. If I led the world we would be in space building ring worlds and making bases on other planets, the moon - there would be no war, and no profit required, for there would be no competition between nations, only one aim to survive. Yall fuckin gay and retarded. Seriously.

Why would you come to /sci/ and then post anti-scientific dogma?

>>2412348

BUT EVERYTHING IS PHYSICAL. PROVE ME WRONG. PROVE THAT THERE IS SOMETHING WE CAN'T DETECT WITH INSTRUMENTS OR WITH OUR SENSES.

>>2404527

>to say "i don't know" is an act of humility; humility is also one of those things that is incredibly useful in human interaction, and that also didn't come from science

YOU REALLY DON'T GET IT. YOU JUST DON'T FUCKING GET IT.

SCIENCE IS ALL ABOUT RECOGNIZING THAT YOU DON'T KNOW AND THEN TRYING TO KNOW. SCIENCE IS ABOUT RECOGNIZING IGNORANCE AND THEN TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

IF I'M UNDERSTANDING YOU HERE, YOU ARE CELEBRATING IGNORANCE. YOU ARE TRYING TO USE "FUCKING MAGNETS, HOW DO THEY WORK?" AS A SERIOUS ARGUMENT.

HOW CAN YOU EVEN LIVE WITH YOURSELF?