/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10481781
based
>>10481129
reread his post. you're literally retarded. constructive discussion can exist without disagreement
>>10481879
there is a reason individuals in both STEM and Humanities, i.e actually educated people opposed to pseudo-intellectuals like you self, are majorly left-leaning. you're simply wrong.
>>10481428
>pic related
>>10481549
>t. retard who has zero knowledge of Marxism.
Many of the heaviest players within Marxism actively working against their class interests as aristocrats you fucking retard. What were they wanting to take?
>envious of anyone more successful than them
What a loaded sentence. I am envious of my boss who is able to take a portion of the money my work generates merely because he owns the company I work for. Is he more successful than me? While, I'm certainly contributing more to society than he is, so that's easily arguable. Tell me this: why should we have a class that is literally useless to society exist? Is being a leech really what we should define success as? inb4 he build the company and manages it haha!!
>destroying the middle class
There isn't a middle class you fucking moron. Economic classes have nothing to do with Marxism.
>>10481521
You're not anon. Modern leftists have done a pathetic job at making it easily digestible, and original marxist texts simply weren't meant for readers today. Look into summaries of the Labour Theory of Value as a start and unironically lurk leftypol. They'll be a good way into understanding.
>>10481759
>Marx assumes
>The best-known advocates of the labor theory were Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx.
(https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/labor-theory-of-value.asp))
>Calls for the destruction of all incentive that people have to work in the first place
>Commubism is when evreyone shares and u dont ahave to work LOL! Ideot idea!
>>10481710
Falling rate of profit and the contradictions it implies that have yet to be solved are a big one. See pic.