/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15127887
The big bang IS creationist. It was a booting up. See pic. There is a young earth type of simulation theoretic version as well though.

>>15045590
>If the universe came from nothing
It came from nothing PHYSICAL. Physicality was booted up at that point.
>Can humans create a small big bang from nothing too?
not from within physicality. You are looking at it as if this universe was created by physicality. It wasn't. Physicality could not have initiated itself because that would mean it would have had to pre-exist itself, which is illogical.

>>15045573
>>15045545
Not that anon but you both are getting right to the interesting questions.

>>14975632
Nothing. The suggestion is not that ALL entities are contingent and demand an explanation or cause. The suggestion is that all entities that BEGIN, of which physicality/the universe is one, demand an explanation or cause. In philosophy, this distinction is the difference between contingent entities and a necessary entity. Matter is data. It's is a set of spatially organized computational objects. Matter can 'begin from nothing', that is begin from nothing from the perspective of those immersed in the virtual world, because the boot up of the time and space is coming from info processing 'outside' of that which is booted up. Here is your philosophical mistake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKKIvmcO5LQ
And here is a little insight into our virtual reality (the physical world)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqVZv1YBxQE>>14975909
>>14975909
There is nothing logically inconsistency with a necessary entity having a different nature than the contingent entity. In fact, there is a difference by necessity. See the first vid in this post.