/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15995568
Lets be honest, do you think this shit makes sense?

Are you telling me they gonna need at least 15 launches of a spacecraft that cant even reach orbit? LMAO, who the fuck was the retard that chose starship as a moon lander? Yeah im thinking they gonna cancel artemis in 1 o 2 years. /spg/ bros, China is our last hope , the good thing is we dont have a to see a nigger and a whore next to LGBT, BLM, Trans and Amerimutt flags

>>15992611
Lest be honest, this shit is cringe as fuck and makes no sense

Youre telling me you need at least 10 starships + SLS launches just to put a nigger and a whore on the moon , and its gonna be ready in years when starship cant even reach orbit? LMAO. thanks god this gonna be cancel after artemis II. So
/sfg/ bros, our last hope to see people on the moon in 4k is China and, at least were not gonna see a LGBT, BLM and Trans flags on the moon

Lets be honest, this shit makes no sense

And its gonna be cancel before any moon landing, so our last hope is China. But at least we dont have to see LGBT and BLM flags on the moon

>at least 15 starships launched
>One weak lunar orbit before landing, (apollo just needed a couple hours)
>Land a fucking building like starship just to stay on the moon 6 days

Who the fuck made this?

>Bu-but this time we are staying!!!

No you wont, NASA got no plans of staying on the moon until gateway station but this is supposed to be way later than artemis III, IV and V. Literally the only goal of this mission according to nasa is to have the firts nig and women there (LMAO!)
All of this gonna be cancelled after artemis II probably because makes no sense, China is our last hope to go back to the moon