/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11093783
>Why do denialists care so much about Al Gore

HEY GRANDPA THERE IS THIS FUCKING THING CALLED A "MEME," MAYBE YOU SHOULD LURK MOAR HAHA

I even fucking put (this is a euphemism) in parenthesis. It's a fucking JOKE dude.. When i said Al Gore i was referring to the broader climate alarmist predictions.

>Prove it with something other than a YouTube video or a denialist blog. None of your links establish that conclusion.
I fucking did you nigger.. don't you fucking think it's fucking CONVENIENT that they found all these different ways of calculating the increase AFTER they found it was much less than they predicted? The fact you don't find this suspicious shows you are irrational and ill equipped to judge the threat of global warming.

And how fucking convenient that you just fucking call anyone who disagrees with you a fucking "denialist" and use ad hominem to discard their hypothesis. IRRATIONAL. HMM DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING BESIDES CLIMATE ALARMIST PROPAGANDA? SEE WHAT I DID THERE?

>Do you even understand what they're talking about in this paper, or do you just skip the paper, read only the abstract, and start jumping to conclusions about the reasoning?
I FUCKING WATCHED THE VIDEOS YOU FUCKING NIGGER WHERE THEY GO OVER IT AND THE PAPER IS PRETTY FUCKING SELF EVIDENT.. JAMES CORBETT IS ONE OF THE MOST RESPECTED DOCUMENTARIANS ON THE INTERNET. YOU ARE TRYING SO FUCKING DESPERATELY FOR FUCKING AD HOMINEM NOW IT'S FUCKING PATHETIC HAHAHA.

IF YOU HAVE SO MUCH FUCKING TIME WHY DONT YOU GO THROUGH THE PAPER AND GIVE US A NICE FUCKING REPORT ANON! AND IT DOESNT FUCKING MATTER.. THE FUCKING TRUTH IS THAT WE WILL NEVER FUCKING KNOW THE REAL TRUTH BECAUSE WE HAVNE'T SPENT OUR WHOLE FUCKING LIVES STUDYING IT AND THE DATA IS FUCKING OBFUSCATED THREE WAYS TO SUNDAY.. THE POINT IM MAKING IS THAT IT'S FUCKING *SUSPICIOUS* AND THE FACT YOU DON'T AGREE SHOWS HOW FUCKING IRRATIONAL YOU ARE!