/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10341435
Nuclear was never as cheap as coal, and fracking completely wrecked the economics of building new nuclear power plants.

>>10082598
All your claims are false

>>10050495
>Because there's a metric fuckton of red tape and lobbying against them by threatened interests and brainlet NIMBY's.
Man, just fucking stop.

>>9966553
>if you want to judge the cost of different energy sources, you must use $ per actual energy produced (measured in GWh, TWh..), not $ per MW
Nuclear still loses to renewables.

>>9837217
>Why're normalfags so scared of nuclear power?
Too expensive

>>9783753
>However, there's quite a few other people who seem to seek out wind and solar threads and shit nuclear all over them. I can't fathom why since wind and solar have nothing at all to do with nuclear, but boy they sure get triggered.
The collapse of natural gas prices due to fracking and the rise of combined cycle gas power plants as the lowest cost electricity producers has broken their brains.
>But that has nothing to do with renewable energy.
That's just how badly their brains got broken.