/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10577317
>The other anon never said that. OP never said that. No on ITT is arguing about that or for that.

This is where every discussion on helping these nations goes. It's about sending them money/aid. Follow along.

>Remember when China was some shithole that built our products? Now they're the biggest economy in the world and still growing, and they are using Africans like we used Chinese.

Oh this is so dishonest. Nixon, who opened trade with China, was fucking adored by them. When the Chinese delegation came to the USA under president Carter, they asked if Nixon would be there (Carter didn't invite him), so they said they would just drive across the country to go and visit him.

>What's being averaged? Quality of life? Wealth? Economic mobility? I can't read this as anything other than you wanting there to be a global divide between people who live in excessively wealthy countries and people who live in excessively poor countries.

There is everything in their nations (in fact, more than here) to turn their nations into non shitholes. Hong Kong has no resources at all besides a deep water port, so how the fuck did we do alright.

The west (or rather, it's shitty elites), constantly asking for third worlders to come in will just turn the western nations into reflections of their new people, which is where they're coming from. Predictors of future behavior is past behavior.

I utterly oppose any kind of NWO, with as much freedom as possible among independent nation states setting themselves up as they please. I don't however, want to see the earth turned into some neoliberals fucking paradise with "muh free movement of people and capital" because they want to grow their stupid stock portfolio.
Ease up on the haterade.