/sci/ - Science & Math

Thanks lads.
>>16004369
>>16004446

>>16004250
>it's like rotating an object
Fascinating.

Is that kind of like algebraic topology?

These are questions from someone that doesn't know anything about math but sometimes gets spontaneously interested and looks into some random topic for hours at a time.

>>15545946
>miles

>>15436615
Why do they form neat lines like that?

What is really wrong with the education system these days? I always here about how garbage it is but are there better alternatives?

I want to do some research work. I'm interested in Music Generation using GANs. I confused about how to proceed. I know stuff about NN from following StatQuest. Guide me please!

>>14511574
>40 grand
i…what?

>>12790223
Wonder how limited they will be when making the new landing legs. Can't change too much without having to redesign all the internals.

>>12776774
Will the Mars Colonial Program have height/weight requirements?
>tfw skinny so won't take up much space or resources

>>12722887
>Does it make you uncomfortable that all of your knowledge of imaginary number fields, borel sets, lebesgue integration, poincare duality, modules, meromorphic functions, etc. aren't sacred? Does the idea really bother you that much?
I have a master's in computer science, and the most complex stuff I've ever dealt with was partial differential equations and calculus of variations. I have no clue what the fuck the things you listed even are. I can do fizzbuzz in one line, though, and I know how to build hydralisks in starcraft.

It is interesting that Starship development seems to be going toward having the whole thing reusable before the maiden flight. Falcon 9 was sending up payloads while testing landing, wonder if we will see the same for Starship.
>Starship launches 400 Starlink satellites
>Booster lands
>Starship RUDs
>You still have an additional 400 Starlinks up and valuable data for Starship
Would be interesting to see desu

Why did 3 stage rockets fall out of favor after the Saturn V? Seems that everything is 2 stage nowadays.

>Next planned rocket launch: Electron on Jan 16
>Next planned Falcon 9 launch: Starlink on Jan 17
>Also planned on Jan 17: Virgin Orbit with LauncherOne
>SLS status: overbudget and behind schedule

>Next planned rocket launch: Electron on Jan 16
>Next planned Falcon 9 launch: Starlink on Jan 17
>Also planned on Jan 17: Virgin Orbit with LauncherOne
>SLS status: overbudget and behind schedule

why do we have microwave ovens but not macrowave ovens?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N_3Kh0gHB8
>SpaceX's Launch Pad Problem

>>12506861
>we also found that when questioned, 5-9 year olds also don't know what the value of a dollar is. obviously, we can conclude that the dollar is inherently worthless, because we, like most people, base the value of everything off what a 5-9 year old says.

>uh yeah guys there's definitely numbers that aren't real they're called imaginary numbers but they're not any less real than real numbers and if you don't believe in it then you're a crackpot yeah they exist they really do just think about the FTA bro we need fake numbers to make this shit true look at electrical engineering bro they use j and shit yeah it's definitely not just a normal 2D vector space yeah you can definitely take the sqrt of a negative number don't question it

Elon planning on having another round of funding for SpaceX
https://archive.is/fRmE0

Another great hurdle is making sure Starship can survive reentry AND perform the Crazy Elon maneuver without anything important being destroyed.
I wonder how they will test this?
IF Starship can SSTO with no cargo they would not have to wait for Super Heavy prototypes to begin testing reentry maneuvers and the hexagonal heatshields.
Exciting times lay ahead.

>>12375616
Falcon 9 is an incredible machine but it has it's weaknesses like any other rocket.
Mainly the inability to launch in anything other than perfect weather since it's so damn skinny.

So anons, do you think they will be able to recover the first stage?

Give me a go or no-go for recovery.

>>12358602
If not a trench then maybe a pool? May be cheaper and easier to build, and water can disperse the energy safely

>>12348387
Set SCE to AUX

>>12337941
Why have the lox header tank in the nosecone at all?
Wouldn't it be better if the two header tanks were closer together or side-by-side?
>t. not an engineer