/sci/ - Science & Math

>i'll plug machinery into my nervous system

Ok, but can't this shit now be used to "control" your nervous system as well, like in the reverse?

Uh.......what's wrong with it?

>>14730708
Not him but for the sake of example, the CYP3A4-
enzyme is involved in metabolizing a lot of drugs, is there a means to increase the activity of an enzyme?
There are drugs that inhibit them so are there conditions that accelerate it? Perhaps if a patient was fasted and didn't have anything else in their system?

I've had a sleeping medication giving me a "hangover" in the morning for a few hours, but the next lowest dosage doesn't do shit and not taking it is worse. Going for a walk helps and the way my broscience thought process goes I'm moving the blood around faster so shits getting out of my system faster.
Pic related, it's me.

>>14723217
>riemann hypothesis

Brainlet here, what can science do with this knowledge were the hypothesis ever solved?

>Light has mass

Big if true, since this means protons decay.
But I typed "John Mandlbaur" into google and instead of announcements of scientific discovery I got a twitter that has heaps of posts and no likes or retweets.

I would love to have been in astrophysics, I love reading about the wonders of space and strange and crazy compounds that exist on and in planets all over the cosmos. I'd like to have been able to have pushed the field forward, however. To be able to solve problems so we all get to experience that feeling of finding out more and more.

But I just don't have the high end mathematical ability required to do it, you read over "unsolved problems in maths/astrophyics" articles and some are just mind boggling. You really do need to be a step above in intellect to attack these things. So I never pursued the career.
All I can really do is be a cheerleader for space/maths related study. Maybe if I ever become really rich I'd give grant money to people and contribute that way.

I don't grasp the "holographic universe" theory at all.

The idea that our universe is orbiting some titanically gargantuan black hole makes me wtf.

>>10602804
Tourist here.
I have no idea what goes into this field but I used to look after a long since retired professor in this topic and it seemed to me he contributed a lot to the human race, so consider this post words of encouragement.

So...why do the people here care about each other's majors, instead of working hard to make a name for themselves?

>at the time of this post, OP is entering his exam now

How do you think he'll do, guys?

>>10580344
>Because the chance of a mitochondrial prokaryote invading another cell and forming a mutual chemical bond that allows for the harvesting of oxygen for the sake of producing ATP is extremely unlikely.

I have no fucking idea what any of that means but it sounds intelligent so whatever, I believe it.

>>10579112
>There are good arguments for the idea that we are living on the surface of a black hole.

Tourist here.
What the fuck? You mean our observable universe is riding on one gigantic, incomprehensibly humongous black hole?

Brainlet tourist here.

Which is the one where there is a different universe for all possible outcomes?
So there is a universe where I did things one way, and things another way, or died at 10 and so on?

>>10571299
>>10571303

What if OP conducted the experiment on the moon?