[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.6204220 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 499 KB, 762x1000, yukari doing math.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6204220

>I can't tell if /sci/ is being raided by CS troll threads or carrying on as usual.
>Will someone please tell me what is going on?

>> No.6171090 [View]
File: 499 KB, 762x1000, yukari doing math.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6171090

Math is the ultimate intellectual pursuit. Prove me wrong.

Protip: You can't.

>> No.4869697 [View]
File: 499 KB, 762x1000, c340dc12d7d116883d50ed73044fa751.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4869697

>>4869601
Again, though. I wasn't asked to definitevly prove 100%. If I was, then I wouldn't have tried. I did, however, prove it regarding the evidence I had, from the point of view of an average human being with no access to higher level tech. Me not being able to 100% prove something wrong wasn't the point of his post, or if it was it was a nonsensical point, because my post had nothing to do with 100% certainty. I really don't see how you can find any justification in defending anything that person said without forsaking logic, but ok.

See how many Ad hocs you had to do? Goes to show you that you're just trying to make a theory make sense, even though the facts don't fit with it. You can do it with anything that's proved, it's just the more it's proved, the more you have to ad hoc.

Point being, I proved it with what little evidence my view point had, since that is what I was asked to do. I'm in the logically superior position.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]