/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11971887
Nah it’s a good thing. Failures on CRS-7 and Amos-6 helped SpaceX make Falcon 9 way more reliable.

Starship is still in the development stage and issues with testing are expected. They will figure it out. They’ve fixed all of their problems with the SN’s.

>MK1 fails due to bad welds between the rings
SN1 fixes those welds
>SN1 fails due to thrust puck defect
SN2 fixes the thrust puck anomaly
>SN3 fails due to test configuration mistake
SN4 does not have this error, and also passes the cryogenic and static fire tests.
>SN4 explodes due to GSE failure
So far SN5 has done well, and they’ve worked out a lot of the problems with Starship.

I’m confident that they’ll fix the Raptor. Have faith.

Also it’s funny that SpaceX doomerism is so common. People were shitting on them after the Demo-2 weather scrub.