/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12145858
I believe quote in attached pic is 100% true, but I don't view biological life as something that directly needs an intelligent creator. You can simulate abiogenesis on your laptop if you wait long enough, you don't need to actually construct the structure yourself. The chances of abiogenesis approach 1 as you wait and try out all possible configurations of systems where local to distant interactions are free to happen.

You/God just need to provide a universe for abiogenesis to have a chance of happening.

So biologocal life isn't what makes me believe in a supreme being, but existence itself. But I'm not a religious person because I actually believe that I am that God: I collapse the wavefunction of the universe.

>>11999985
For a lot of very smart people, the cream of the crop of humanity, simulation theory emerges as the only rational explanation of the universe. Our understanding of science is inexorably leading us back to belief in God.

>>10355473
>The most confusing people are the people with PhD's in some physics field that still hold a religion. Like fuck, did you even read your textbook?

admit it, when you first started learning about the natural sciences you were an athiest, but you cant deny the fact as you grow older that there is SOMETHING beyond us mortal beings, this is reprehensible.

ITT God is real,and atheism is just immaturity manifested by pseudo-intellectualism