/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6399182
>you're being multiple variously large douchebags
No. I'm the one who answered your Higgs mechanism question here
>>6397768
yesterday. I posted in this thread exactly once, namely the answer in the first post where I state the transformation rules OP asks for and suggest to him that he could just ask in my related thread - because without critical mass bumping it, a technical thread is gone if I stay away for 24h.
Then someone writes
>Why don't you write down the fucking Lagrangian?
then in return you call me
>a fucking douchebag
And that's what you get for putting in some effort on /sci/.

>Please stop avatarfagging
fuck that shit