/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15274000
>So your worry is more about dosage?
The worry is about the lack of requirement for testing so called:
>excipients
>adjuvants
>preservatives

There are specific laws, which circumvent the requirement for safety testing.
You can literally put mercury and aluminium in vaccines, without ever studying these compounds and what they do to the body.

if you put it in vaccines, the manufacturer does not have to show safety of any of the excipients or adjuvants, except that it does not kill it.
No pharmacokinetics, toxicology, mutagenicity, pharmacodynamic study is required for any excipient or compound that is declared by the manufacturer as "inactive ingredient".

Also they don't have to do "real placebos" and never did, so no foundation for safety is there.
You can take a "licensed" vaccine as comparator to an vaccine.
With the same amount of toxic "excipients" in question and pretend it is a placebo.
Then when the placebo group and the main vaccine group has similar amount of adverse events you call it "placebo effect" when in fact the reaction stems from the "adjuvant" and not the "active ingredient" namely: virus particle or memeRNA.

They obfuscate effects and never provided a true safety assesment of any compound that is "alongside" the "active" ingredient.
Hell they even put soap in vaccines as excipents and attempt to put ricin as "adjuvant" in vaccines, because "its inactive".
https://ir.soligenix.com/2021-08-23-Soligenix-Announces-Publication-Demonstrating-Successful-Formulation-and-Heat-Stabilization-of-Filovirus-Vaccine-Platform-for-Ebola-and-Marburg-Virus-Diseases

> Elements of this vaccine platform have been utilized in our ricin toxin, filovirus and COVID-19 vaccine candidates, indicating its broad applicability.
In case you don't know ricin is a extremly toxic plant poison:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricin