/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8251742
>We concluded that whatever philosophy is, a philosopher does not understand all those topics, nor contribute to them in any meaningful way.
is much friendlier than

>>8251631


How does the cow become more useful once explained?
It is still the same idea of a cow, just explained.

How are you contributing usefulness when all you can do is define it by historical projection.

Dedicated philosophy of math is also philosophy of language. The appeal to the subject to be logical doesn't turn the thing into something logical which is fine because it is what makes logic unsubjectifiable...