/sci/ - Science & Math

I see being notorious cranks doesn't stop these two from getting named dropped 1,000x a day.

I see Manafort's fake trial is starting tomorrow. His partner "Rick Gates," that's my old boss Robert Garrett. RG had no problem throwing money at me to be a stupid ass little bitch in his office, and the Ukrainians had no problem giving millions of dollars to "Manna fort" for selling my semen to them, but no one wants to pay me for actual, real-life, productive hard work in mathematics and physics.
>$300k starting
>any job I want
I've still got a few more days, but I am pretty angry at my diminshing prospects. Too bad my parents stole my inheritance too, that would be really helpful around now.

>>9900177

One thing might be a coincidence, but when it also gives the three most important dimensionless constants of physics and describes correctly like 10 unsolved physical anomalies, and then also has the right energy in a certain channel, in the application that is exactly suited to the theoretical formalism, that is probably not a coincidence. In any case, it bears further scrutiny to rule out the case of incidental numerical alignment

>>9895242
In 2011, I made a hypothesis about adding a negative time mode such that the positive and negative time modes were relatively scaled according to the golden ratio. The fact that dark energy in the universe is observed confirmed an earlier hypothesis about accelerating time and ,as a matter of theoretical inquiry, I went on to consider a second hypothetical proposition. Then I examined what you can do with the golden ratio, and I got so many positive results, I just kept going.

Recently, I used the Schrodinger equation as a control to get a classical limit, and then I made an "experimental equation" which has one one totally imaginary mode of propagation. Then I computed some characteristic energies of the modes and found they were the same as the energies of a recently discovered negative mode in the quantum optics. My finding that the energy shift of the negative optical mode is exactly the same as the energy of the "experimental equation" is really great. I described actual data, accurately, with an energy function. My interpretation for the energy shift in the experiment being 100% caused by the dump of the energy is a certain volume is really great. Everything about it makes sense, and the numbers work out exactly pretty much right.

Will they reward it?

>The Golden Ratio in the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://2occatl.net/Physics/GoldenRatio__20180726.pdf