/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14958721
Not the anone you're replying to. The idea "everything is consciousness" is perfectly rational, if not more than self-proclaimed rationalism. All "external" phenomena which can be described are necessarily appearances within consciousness. Although it doesn't prove or disprove the existence of some physical world, this is a hint materialism, who wants to believe some incomplete non-finite chain of causality may somehow cause consciousness, is not based on any tangible evidences either (hence "hard-problem" memes).
Presuming God has the ability to imagine infinite universes from both ends and beginnings simultaneously, like a lightning's bidirectional discharge from both ground and sky reaching itself at the center, can make consciousness really tricky to understand. In other words, the ability for human perspectives to imagine stories, movies, animes, etc, with conscious determinism, can be the same ability subconscious collectives may use to imagine their own universes. But this capability can be turned against itself by collective egos to lose themselves within self-consistent realities full of endless dramas and meaningless sub-goals. Time itself would be imaginary whereas consciousness would not have any essence, other than the ability to chose sub-infinities (whatever they are) within the absolute, or something.
>>14958842
You are replacing a belief system with another belief system. This is not helpful.