/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7581430
Look at this retard
>probably cause more rainfall in Saudi Arabia
Source? Nah!
>Amazon rainforest was little affected by receiving less Saharan dust particles.
Source? Nah! My little anecdote disproves the actual research
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_dust#References
>Nature is very resilient. It will adapt to changing conditions.
One way it is currently adapting to changing conditions is through global desertification. Which has forced millions of people to relocate, and indirectly killed millions.
>the impact would still be net positive.
No. Because you could have built 1000 hospitals 1000 schools and 10 nuclear power plants for the money you spent on making another useless Saharan salt lake. Pic related