/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6915830
>Another just breeds like a hamster just like 99.999% of the entire population doing shit all important for the rest of humanity for generations to come. Literally no different at all from anyone else, doesn't stand out, and more than likely isn't too happy with their lives either.

You realise its possible to do both, right?

Literally every single one of my professors is married with a family and children.

Girls bring stability and emotional fulfilment to your life. Humans can't function without social interaction (unless you're an aspie like Newton or Dirac). Getting it all from one girl who you form a close bond with is just efficient and allows you to focus on your work the rest of the time.

Also sex.

Feynman had an IQ of 125. That isn't even high enough to join MENSA. Majority of the people here claim to have IQs 130+. If that is the case why haven't you achieved more than Feynman?

>>6830792
Is this too obvious?

Not the guy who you're arguing with by the way, but I'm curious how many guys fit the criteria you laid.

>>6819521
>Can someone with a 140 IQ win the Nobel Prize?