[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10787992 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, FixedTree.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10787992

>>10787456
There is a lot of garbage but avoid the obvious garbage and you will be fine here, and in /g/

>> No.10762521 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, 1561582518429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10762521

>>10762388
That's what im wondering. The birth of the universe maybe? restarting again... REPENT NOW

>> No.10758957 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, FixedTree.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10758957

>>10757834
Are you the Collatz-anon from a few weeks ago that was willing to pay up for a proof?

>> No.9265077 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, 1502954478954.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9265077

>>9265067
Furthermore, is it necessarily the case that in order to discover quantum mechanics, you must first discover basic chemistry and other such topics? It intuitively makes sense, but is it possible that an intelligent agent could evolve in the universe to attack these fundamental problems from another angle

Maybe coincidentally with inherent knowledge of something complicated like fluid mechanics, but basic Newtonian mechanics are very strange and foreign to this entity since it evolved in water for instance?

Is there anything inherent about the universe itself that necessitates these knowledge dependencies, or is it entirely based on the nature of the observational and cognitive capacities of the intelligent agent who is doing the analysis of the universe?

>> No.9110251 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, fixedtree.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9110251

and this one too

>> No.8927368 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, 1448479974764.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8927368

>Fill in the blank.

As the rest of 4chan gets worse, /sci/ gets _____.

> There is no character limit.

>> No.6965531 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, funny-gifs-tree-fractal[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6965531

>>6965529

>> No.5112834 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, light.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5112834

The general consensus among scientists regarding the centre of the universe, is that is doesn't exist.

So, if the universe came into being via the Big Bang, why can't we locate the centre of this event?

Also, if there is a black hole at the centre of each galaxy, wouldn't it be reasonable to infer that there's a super massive black hole located in the midsts of our universe?

Doesn't the black hole at the centre of each galaxy imply that the galaxy is the result of a supernova? If so, that would mean every galaxy was once a single sun.

>> No.1970876 [View]
File: 163 KB, 400x292, 1274603725232.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1970876

I'm sorry, I'm really rusty with math, could I get some help here?

If something has a volume of 10lb/4.5kg, what would be the surface area, assuming it would be spherical... I tried it but it came out as 12 meters sq.. not sure if that's right?

Any help would be appreciated, even just explaining to me how to figure it out

Picture unrelated

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]