/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12321663
Since you have refused to distinguish between the algebraic and geometric representations, I will cease to entertain you notion that Def 2.3.2 require points to be elements of R, pic related. If you would accept Axiom 2.3.11, then I could prove you wrong even with this concession. However, if you refuse to acknowledge that Axiom, and also Theorem 3.2.2 which proves that X cannot conform to Axiom 4.2.6, then I must point out that X is not in necessarily in R at all, in either representation.

>X is a subset of R
this is wrong