/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10831852
What are you counting?

>>10831855
What? Humans count things with numbers yes. The universe does not do this. Numbers are a language, my god.


>>10831897
>Then why do we "find" numbers or consistent patterns like the golden ratio in nature? Are they just coincidences?
You can count how many conch shells and the divisions inside a conch shell. That doesn't tell you what a "conch shell" or "division of a conch shell" is.

>>10831879
>Quantity exists
Of what?

>>10749642
>We have different objects that behave differently with respect to each other. We call these objects fields and their interactions force. There is nothing more to explain about any object

So it is all the same shit then? Is that what you're saying? It's all just "fields" and we don't know what they are and that's okay? What planet am I on? Are you trolling?

>>10706186
>Why is disease a bad thing

Only in clown world would such a retard ask something like this.

10700761

>.. That's... That's what a heat pump is. Why did you come to a math and science board?
A type of heatpump, yes. Apparently they make several types. I google "ground heatpump"(your words) and I get nothing but geothermal type heatpumps, some run on water. This is the info I have to work with bro.

>>10700643
>You're extracting heat to or from 6ft underground

No part of this system is underground. Let me repeat that for you. NO PART OF THIS SYSTEM IS UNDERGROUND. I have no clue what you're on about. Just post what you think I have or what unit you're referring to. No pipes are underground. No electrical lines are underground. It is an outside coil and an inside blower, the cycles reverse in heating/cooling and is connected by insulated copper tubing. It use a fan and a scroll compressor.

>You made it a factor.
No U. You're the only one bitching about MY energy usage, I am fine with it. I am not fine with regulating it and adding more costs for no logical reason. Stop dragging this on.

>It's not your heat. It literally cannot be.
I mean you can factor in other shit too. Electric dryer/washer might contribute. Also, you STILL HAVE NOT GOTTEN THE PART WHERE I HAVE SAID MULTIPLE TIMES THAT IT'S THE WORST ONE (1) MONTH OUT OF THE YEAR. BELOW FUCKING ZERO MEANS THE "HEAT" TAKES MORE ENERGY TO ABSORB. Right now it's $120, but the pumps are way more efficient in cooling. This setup is more efficient because I am not burning ANY fossil fuel, so I am saving money on that. However if these green lunatics keep inflating the price of electricity then guess what? It will become cheaper to heat with oil.

In clown world I will end up burning more oil because of these dumb green energy policies.

/g/ told me that 5G is going to kill us all and give us cancer. Is this true or are they just spreading disinformation?

>>10525299
>You consented by staying in the country.
Wrong, my parents consented for me and a contract and number were assigned to me without my consent or conscious awareness. Keep digging the theft rabbit hole, at this level we're now up to "human trafficking tier" thievery going on.

>Go live in the ocean or some random island if you dont want to be taxed
How about you not take my shit for doing nothing and leave me the fuck alone?
>Oh right because they would rather not do that and take my shit by force because they want it instead

>>10461687
>>10461480
>>10460858

How "real" is an "effect"? Things can be hot and cold, does that make "hot" and "cold" exist as something that does something? No. Something causes something else to obtain the quality of "hotness" or "coldness".

How cold/hot are you right now? How hot/cold will you be tomorrow? How old and decayed are you now? In 40 years? Does that mean you'll be "less real", "more real" or the exact same realness in 40 years? Obviously not the latter, and the former isn't exactly an absolute now is it? Neither are you. You don't exist because you aren't complete.
Bask in the joy of being able to change, for an everlasting being or deity certainly wouldn't nor could not. It wouldn't even think, because it would be all knowing. The truest "absolute".

>>10460858
And the truest absolute is the absolute itself and is therefore self-evident to itself. It cannot be known for it is not self-evident to us as mere parts of that order, like how an organ cannot perform all the tasks of the body. It's a locution more than a self-contradiction, like saying "we with our limited potential will never know the real truth" or "the truth evades us no matter how hard we search".
>>10460866
ONLY from the perspective of a being with enough virtue to enact the same action (of non absoluteness).