/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7573438
>I am curious as to what the upper limit of useful fps increase in technology would be.
>Surely there would be a point where humans could no longer notice any difference in smoothness of video, regardless of how many more frames per second were seen.

>I am curious

if you would be genuinely curious then you you'd find it out yourself
>buy a monitor with ridiculously high refresh rate
>run an old game with good console command support
>cap it at different framerates
>find out when you stop noticing a difference
boy, that sure seems hard and complicated
better ask /sci/, that's much easier

>>7548750
>spoonfeeding a simple physics question
he'll never get how to manipulate a couple of simple general equations into equations that he can use to solve the given problem that way
copy and pasting answers from someone who already derived the proper equations skips like 95% of the actual work

What part off the brain is responsible for visualizing things? What could cause someone to not be able to visualize?

I'm wondering because today, I finally figured out that when you visualize you should get mental pictures, rather than a vague thought about how something would look if you could see it. I've also figured out that everybody can do this but me, and I am fucked in the head.