/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14796776
What I'm suggesting is that Krakatoa came immediately after a pulse of volcanic/tectonic activity that may have started in the late 1870s and likely nowhere near Krakatoa.
Why am I thinking "solar cycles" and magnetopause? We all should know by now that the sun's solar wind causes a lot of our tectonic activity.
Btw, there was a troft precisely around the time of that "expected activity".
Strangely, Krakatoa would be the anomaly perhaps there. But there certainly were the conditions for volcanic activity at the time of that el nino.

Also explains why el ninos/la ninas are pretty regular, don't you think?