/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10626536
I'd counter this by saying that, despite the fact that you have no evidence, you WANT TO BELIEVE a certain type of dog is "evil" or "programmed/bred/genetically predisposed" to kill or attack, because it reassures you.
It orders the world for you.
It makes things simpler.

Like conspiracy fags -- they want to believe that there's a puppet-master behind everything because that means the world isn't as chaotic as it seems. There's a reason for most of the things that are happening.

>Essentially the same comfort religion provides.

I need help identifying an object in the sky. It occurred last year in July for a few weeks (lost dates), so I expect to see it again soon. If I do, I may buy an expensive telescope just to solve the mystery. With binoculars, it’s still just a shiny dot against the blue sky. Research has shown nothing.

At around 21:00ish at dusk there is a shiny object in the sky about 335°az and 55° elevation from Columbus, GA. It only lasts for about 10min and moves maybe an inch across the sky very slowly. It appears that at dusk, the sun is at the perfect angle to reflect off of it. Before disappearing, it flickers a bit. It is moving too slowly to be a satellite, and I thought geostationary satellites would be too far to see.

Ideas?

>>9796093
oh yeah there's no gravity right lol
so it can't describe a base LMAO physics BTFO

>>9700513
People who want to believe in many worlds.

>>9527703
kys u bitch ass numb headed pea brain sized sleazy thot lookin ass soy boi.

>>9091689
MERITOCRACY

>I have information I can't disclose, yet, and not from Shawyer directly, that has removed any last little bit of doubt I had the thrust is very real. However like any new tech, still in development, there are issues that can cloud performance. As I was told my one replication, keeping a high Q frustum working at optimal Rf frequency is NOT easy. Smallest drift off and thrust stops. Constantly changing temp of various frustum areas also changes cavity frequency enough to detune. Cavity Q of 50,000 to 60,000 sounds great to get good thrust but it turns into a monster intent on NOT producing thrust.

>Based on what I have learned, blasting away with a wide band magnetron into a low Q cavity may be a good option as it really reduces lost/NO thrust from being constantly off resonance with a high Q cavity.

>I'm told the peer reviewed paper Shawyer will present in 2015, with his commercial partners, will be an eye opened. No more doubts. All over. Time to start building or buying as the case may be EM Drives.

I'm about to blow from excitement.