/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12305866
Very Based takedown of "consensus science" as if such a thing exists or even would matter if it did.

I agree with his critique of climate models.
First of all, there is no single consensus model, putting a lie to the "scientific consensus" myth, which is no more than a political bullying meme to try and socially pressure skeptics.

Second, the many different models out there vary wildly in outcome and on average have performed very poorly (as predicted) in measuring future climate temperature change. The people that push for an end to discourse because "the science has been settled" can never seem to explain why since their models don't actually predict correctly 10 years of change, why should we assume that their predictions of 100 years of change will be correct.