/sci/ - Science & Math

>Irrational numbers have exact values Anon, it's irrefutable

Oh really? Then why don't you write out what Pi is

>haha that's pretty easy 3.1415...

No, the full number thank you

>w-what do you mean the full number? That's impossible

So you can't directly reference the supposed "exact value" that pi is?

>w-well obviously, but that's just because...

So, without a direct reference, the only alternative definition is an indirect proxy of a converging set of sequences?

>well yes, but....

Thusly an irrational number has no exact value. Thusly all irrational numbers are enumerated by the algorithm specified in the OP

>NOOOOOOO BUT I WAS TOLD BY OTHER MATHEMATICIANS THAT IRRATIONAL NUMBERS ARE AN EXCEPTION TO THE RULES

I'm afraid sir you've been Had. You were told to believe things that simply aren't true.

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BUT MUH CANTOR'S DIAGONAL ARGUMENT, IS THAT WRONG TOO??!?!?!?

Yes, that is incorrect too.

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO MEEE!!!!!!!!!!!

>>11592543
> YOU FORGOT TO POST ANOTHER BEARDED REDDITOR IMAGE

> SHAME TOO BECAUSE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HILARIOUS THE 15000TH TIME

>>11565139
>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T FORCE US SCHIZOS TO FORMALLY PROVE OUR MINDWANK FANTASIES NOOOOOOO