[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15682471 [View]
File: 84 KB, 428x243, IMG_4550.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15682471

>>15665035
We’re not even close to reaching the saturation of the greenhouse effect though.

>> No.15321742 [View]
File: 84 KB, 428x243, 2F2659DB-E9D7-49F5-9A67-8161A05D39A4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15321742

>>15320862
Damn if only there wasn’t observational data to prove that the greenhouse effect is not even close to reaching saturation

>> No.15304042 [View]
File: 84 KB, 428x243, 6CA6FC81-2F26-4F63-AD76-0A1F7CC34E88.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15304042

>>15304022
>modified
If CO2 was at saturation it would be clear in the data and the relationship would be flat by now. We’re not even close.

>> No.15239178 [View]
File: 84 KB, 428x243, 7FB7BB01-C024-4250-B3AD-58226A36118B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15239178

Another easily disproven claim by deniers is that we’re near the saturation point of the greenhouse effect when it’s evidently not the case

>> No.15185910 [View]
File: 84 KB, 428x243, D08B85ED-8440-461E-BEB0-7111B61755A9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15185910

>>15185823
The thing is that we’re not even close to that why are you posting easily disproven claims.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]