/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15880166
Science is luciferian/satanic, why are you so surprised?

>>15451105
>>15451104
Greeks knew nothing, they were a bunch of arrogant, good for nothing lot just like modern scientists.
When you make big claims, you better have solid proof, not CGI.

>>15432249
They reject God, pump their veins full of drugs and vaccines, take meds, eat unhealthy food, then become degenerates and pretend they were "born that way".

>>15430765
Implanting microchips in your brain.
Scientists are evil monsters just like the jews and satanists who finance them.

The replacement of God with Lucifer/humanism.
Mankind does not owe everything to science, but to God. Why are a bunch of corrupt, lazy men in lab coats who never worked a single day of their life supposed to be worshipped, again?

>>15059720
University is a scam.
Read the Bible if you want to learn about truth.

>>15004943
To tell the truth in places where people hate it the most.

Scientists worship the snake who gave Adam and Eve the fruit of knowledge, good luck with that. They oppose God, faith and religion with "reason"(the counterfeit religion of Satan).

>>14958210
Not a single proof of a monkey evolving into a man, other than mountains of abstract unproven garbage.
Show me a single monkey turning into a man without making excuses like "we need a few million years" or "you are retarded".
You will never ever be able to. That is because you stand on the side of lies, evil and falsehoods.

ive spent many hours reading on this, pondering on it and looking at NDEs, they are definitely real and not just hallucinations. there's only two likely possibilities here.

1) we do live in a simulation, that's a terrifying thought because who knows what we will wake up to, we may not like it either.

2) god is real, afterlife is real, idealism, spirits, the soul, eternal consciousness is real.

simulation theory is a terrifying possibility. however i think if this were a simulation then reality would be presented differently. consciousness being needed to bring things into existence may seem like a good point of evidence for simulation but it really isnt. you can still simulate a world without the internal characters seeing/interacting with it. the simulation probably only requires the outsiders (creators) to observe it. even if they were to walk away the simulations happenings would still be recorded somewhere. you do not need sentient characters to populate a world in order for that reality to exist, it does however need a creator.

the more likely answer is god. god prexisted sentient life/observers, the universe existed prior to that, god is the first observer and as state with the simulation, a creator is nessacary.

cosmological argument wins again.