[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10574407 [View]
File: 54 KB, 640x480, 1514452786106.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10574407

>>10573644
we can only imagine a black hole as having its mass on the INSIDE.
but if we took some normal mass (lets say a chunk of metal) from our universe and sent it to another nearby 'bubble universe', it may 'naturally settle' into a different configuration, density, and speed.
it could potentially 'collapse' into a black hole without being compressed, or even in a spherical shape.

it could theoretically form into a 'donut' of matter spinning at near light speed.. (or even exceeding light speed as defined in its original universe.. this area needs more study).
i believe this is what dark matter is doing in our universe.
it is reaching MUCH higher density and speed than it EVER would in universe B, it is 'projecting' an area that 'imitates' black hole density in the center of galaxies..

except central black hole of galaxies do not have a 'singularity', and do not function like a stellar mass black hole.

the reason a supermassive black hole 'sucks in matter', is because the 'event horizon' is actually the point of no return
it is the region that orbiting matter exceeds the speed of light and can no longer interact with this timeline. the event horizon of supermassive black holes is a built in firewall for stopping causality violation in our universe.

stellar mass black holes work on a totally different principle, and i think they might not even really be black holes, they could just be a planck star. (that would explain why stellar mass black holes emit hawking radiation, but supermassive black holes do not)..

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]