/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15978390
>which models were updated to align with previous predictions?

https://www.carbonbrief.org/major-correction-to-satellite-data-shows-140-faster-warming-since-1998/


>Major correction to satellite data shows 140% faster warming since 1998

Every year with every report, they adjust data to make the past cooler, while they make the present warmer.
Also various other data tamperings are cited here:
https://realclimate.science/data-tampering-at-ushcngiss/#gsc.tab=0 with direct links to the gis data
Satelite and other data, get constantly revisioned.

>we mesured 24°C at town x in 1969-06-01
>50 years later
>our satelite data and models calculated that it had to be cooler than that
>so we update retroactively the temperature to 22°C

And so on.
Retroactive revision.
Because:
>plausible deniability
>who will look
>who will remember
>who will verify that satite data match unrevisionable local weather measurments
>who will question satelite data

Easy peasy lemon squeezy, now give more money to the billionaires and eat your bowl of crickets with cockroach milk, while you enjoy your curfew in your 15 minute city, you useless carbon emitting waste of biomass.