/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10815437
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>In thus concluding, This has nothing to do with the efficacy of sunscreen [even though this was never refuted]. Are you broken or just trolling?
www.reddit.com

do not come back

>>10803282
>Consider how much political/social effort goes to issues of 'consent'. That's time and thought that could go toward preparing the population for One World Government or expanding the surveillance state

>>10803321
Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered. You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

You realize no one is going to critically examine those and that none of us have credentials (since we're anonymous, duh) to analyze them and put them in appropriate context? Because that's a shitton of labor and time and not just anyone can do it for it to have a significance.
Especially in order to make a point on some imageboard where a thread dies in an hour.
I can pull anything from my ass and call it a source and if that convinces you then you're an idiot.
Any substantial discussion in a place like this is pointless by definition. That goes for both of you.