/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6899513
>still adding the extra stuff

Yes, you are correct, in that sometimes we don't use the law of identity, as we are dealing with dynamics. However, those cases are very few and in-between, compared to the static.

Identity at it foundation is much simpler than what you are making it. Anytime you have a static concept, parameter, idea, space, etc, you are using the law of identity. Even as you type on your keyboard, you assume you keys will not change, that is you assuming the law of identity! If you take a measurement M, and then refer to it, you are using the law of identity! Assuming that M = M! The law of identity is everywhere. And it is axiomatically assumed.